天天搞天天干,福利中文字幕最新永久,极品无码一区二区三区

Wansai Ounkeo
You might feel something is off once you realise that Singapore has zero tariffs on US goods but Trump hit them with tariffs anyway. Singapore even has an agreement allowing US citizens to buy property in Singapore without extra taxation, which is a damn huge deal. We fucked them anyway.

一旦你意識到新加坡對美國商品實行零關(guān)稅，而特朗普卻仍對其加征關(guān)稅，你可能就會覺得有些不對勁。新加坡甚至還達(dá)成了一項協(xié)議，允許美國公民在新加坡購買房產(chǎn)無需額外繳稅，這可是件大事。但不管怎樣，我們還是坑了他們。

Australia buys more from us than we buy from them, and they are an important strategic partner for us. We hit them with tariffs anyway. Tore them a new asshole.

澳大利亞從我們這里購買的商品比我們從他們那里購買的要多，而且他們是我們重要的戰(zhàn)略伙伴。但不管怎樣，我們還是對他們加征了關(guān)稅。狠狠教訓(xùn)了他們一頓。

EU had a 1% tariff on US goods. We hit them with massive Fuck You tariffs.

歐盟對美國商品征收1%的關(guān)稅。我們對他們征收了巨額的報復(fù)性關(guān)稅。

Left or Right, we wouldn’t be Americans without our massive victim complex, then massively overeacting to our own perceived victimisation.

不管是左派還是右派，如果沒有強(qiáng)烈的受害者情結(jié)，并且對自己臆想的受害遭遇做出過激反應(yīng)，那我們就不算是美國人了。

Mats Andersson
Because the “reciprocal” tariffs aren’t.

因為“互惠”關(guān)稅并非如此。

Typical tariffs on US made goods in the EU is 4%. Not the 40% Trump said. He lied to you again.

歐盟對美國制造商品征收的典型關(guān)稅是4%。并非特朗普所說的40%。他又一次對你撒謊了。

Those EU-imposed tariffs are targeted to very specific goods. Not a blanket tariff on everything.

這些歐盟征收的關(guān)稅針對的是非常特定的商品。并非對所有商品都征收統(tǒng)一關(guān)稅。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

Tariffs are like knives. Some are scalpels, and can be used to cure people. Some are scythes, and if wielded inexpertly, have a tendency to take your own leg off at the knee.

關(guān)稅就像刀子。有些是手術(shù)刀，可以用來治病救人。有些則是鐮刀，如果使用不當(dāng)，很可能會把自己的膝蓋以下部分砍掉。

You can use tariffs to protect a domestic industry you absolutely want to have. The UK is busy nationalising their last remaining steel production, because they absolutely want to have the capacity in case there’s a war. Some foods have the same situation in many countries: you absolutely want to be able to feed your own population in a crisis. No one minds that.

你可以利用關(guān)稅來保護(hù)你絕對希望擁有的國內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)。英國正忙著將其僅存的鋼鐵生產(chǎn)國有化，因為他們絕對希望在發(fā)生戰(zhàn)爭時有這樣的生產(chǎn)能力。在許多國家，一些食品也存在同樣的情況：你絕對希望在危機(jī)中能夠養(yǎng)活本國人民。沒人會對此有意見。

Tariffs can’t fix a trade imbalance. The only way you can fix that is to start making things people want to buy. Blanket tariffs do the exact opposite: they stop trade, they keep your industry from becoming competitive.

關(guān)稅無法解決貿(mào)易失衡問題。解決這一問題的唯一辦法是開始生產(chǎn)人們想買的東西。全面征收關(guān)稅的效果恰恰相反：它們阻礙了貿(mào)易，使本國產(chǎn)業(yè)無法具備競爭力。

Doug Mullett
Let’s look at Australian beef.

讓我們來看看澳大利亞牛肉。

We produce demonstrably “clean” beef and if anything goes wrong, the entire history of each animal can be traced to find why it went wrong. We don’t have foot and mouth disease (hoof and mouth in the USA) and we don’t have mad cow disease.

我們生產(chǎn)的牛肉顯然是“無污染”的。如果出現(xiàn)任何問題，可以追溯每頭牛的完整履歷，以查明問題的原因。我們這里沒有口蹄疫（在美國叫蹄疫），也沒有瘋牛病。

We allow imports of beef and beef products was long as the meat is free from diseases and the history or any beef can be traced back if a problem does occur. However, we don’t allow farming practices which are harmful to the animal or potentially harmful to a consumer.

只要肉類無病害，且一旦出現(xiàn)問題任何牛肉的來源都能追溯，我們就允許進(jìn)口牛肉及牛肉制品。不過，我們不允許存在對動物有害或可能對消費者有害的養(yǎng)殖方式。

The USA imports cattle to fatten in feed lots with hormones. There is no tracking of the individual animals. If we allow such beef into Australia, there is the potential to lose our current markets and render harm to all consumers of our beef (nationally and internationally).

美國進(jìn)口牛只，在飼養(yǎng)場用激素催肥。這些牛只沒有個體追蹤記錄。如果我們允許這種牛肉進(jìn)入澳大利亞，就有可能失去我們現(xiàn)有的市場，并對我國（國內(nèi)和國際）所有牛肉消費者造成損害。

So - we don’t have tariffs on beef from the USA - but their beef has to meet our standard, which it doesn’t, so no beef from the USA is allowed in (some cooked beef is). However, apparently McDonalds in the USA mixes internal beef with Australian imported beef to improve its quality to produce the hamburgers its USA customers want.

所以，我們對美國牛肉不征收關(guān)稅，但美國牛肉必須符合我們的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，而實際上它并不達(dá)標(biāo)，因此美國牛肉不被允許進(jìn)口（一些熟牛肉除外）。不過，顯然美國的麥當(dāng)勞會將美國本土牛肉與從澳大利亞進(jìn)口的牛肉混合，以提高品質(zhì)，從而制作出符合美國消費者需求的漢堡。

However, we buy a lot of military aviation equipment from the USA and are preparing to buy A$320 billion (edit - thanks) of USA nuclear submarines. The trade balance is heavily in USA’s favour. However, if we have an unreliable leader in the USA who sees everything in transactional terms and is irrational in dealing with us and others, we may well look at other sources of military and other equipment, We also provide bases for personnel and equipment, plus an intelligence base and a communication base for underwater assets.

然而，我們從美國購買了大量軍用航空設(shè)備，并且正準(zhǔn)備斥資3200億澳元（編輯注 - 多謝提醒）購買美國核潛艇。貿(mào)易平衡對美國極為有利。不過，如果美國出現(xiàn)一位不可靠的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人，此人凡事都從交易的角度看待，在與我們及其他國家打交道時不理性，那么我們很可能會尋求其他軍事及其他裝備的供應(yīng)來源。我們還為人員和裝備提供基地，另外還為水下資產(chǎn)提供一個情報基地和一個通信基地。

If push comes to shove, in a real “trade war” with Australia, heads Australia wins and tails the USA loses.

如果形勢迫不得已，在一場與澳大利亞真正的“貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)”中，不管怎樣都是澳大利亞贏，美國輸。

Jeremy Glenesk
They weren't reciprocal tariffs. Most nations had literally zero tariffs in effect against the US, for any product. These tariffs weren't in retaliation for tariffs already in place. Trump just really likes the idea of tariffs, so he did them, then made up the excuse that these other nations were all being big big meanies, and so we have to be mean back. It was all just bullshit to sell his stupid idea, and oh look, it's been a fucking disaster.

這些并不是互惠關(guān)稅。大多數(shù)國家實際上對任何產(chǎn)品都沒有對美國征收關(guān)稅。這些關(guān)稅并不是對已有關(guān)稅的報復(fù)。特朗普只是非常喜歡關(guān)稅這個主意，所以他就這么做了，然后編造借口說其他國家都是大壞蛋，所以我們必須回?fù)?。這一切不過是為了推銷他那愚蠢的想法而胡說八道，瞧瞧，結(jié)果成了一場徹頭徹尾的災(zāi)難。

Because Trump is a moron, and also because he doesn't give the slightest fuck about you. You folks need to give up this idea that Trump and other billionaires are your fucking friends. They aren't. They don't become billionaires by being nice to the downtrodden. They do it by exploiting you. Trump is exploiting you now, and destroying your retirements, because it benefits him and his friends.

因為特朗普是個蠢貨，還因為他根本不在乎你們。你們得摒棄特朗普和其他億萬富翁是你們朋友這種想法。他們不是。他們能成為億萬富翁可不是靠善待弱勢群體。他們靠的是剝削你們。特朗普現(xiàn)在就在剝削你們，還在毀掉你們的退休金，因為這對他和他的朋友們有利。

Allen Crandall
Are you really THAT incapable of independent thought?

你真的那么缺乏獨立思考能力嗎？

Before Trump was elected we all lived in an almost tariff-free ( y'know - free trade ) world where very few goods had any tariff at all, and those that did were mostly small and only applied to a few things.

在特朗普當(dāng)選之前，我們都生活在一個幾乎沒有關(guān)稅（你知道的——自由貿(mào)易）的世界里，幾乎沒有什么商品有關(guān)稅，就算有，稅率大多也很低，而且只適用于少數(shù)商品。

BTW - this state of global free-trade ( WTO - World Trade Organization and the GATT - General Agreement on Trade & Tariffs ) was championed by the USA.

順便說一句，這種全球自由貿(mào)易的局面（世界貿(mào)易組織，即WTO，以及《關(guān)稅及貿(mào)易總協(xié)定》，即GATT）是由美國倡導(dǎo)的。

HE STARTED THIS TRADE WAR !!!

是他挑起了這場貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)?。?！
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

I dont really think he is stupid - I think he is canny and he believes YOUR ignorance will allow him to distract you enough that you won't even notice all the stuff he and Elon Musk are really up to. When you finally do notice it will be too late. Way too late.

我真不覺得他傻，我覺得他很精明。而且他覺得你很無知，這樣他就能充分分散你的注意力，讓你根本注意不到他和埃隆·馬斯克到底在搞什么名堂。等你最終察覺到的時候，就太晚了，實在是太晚了。

Wayne Smith
Back in 2018, trump signed a trade agreement with Canada and Mexico, waffling on about the greatest trade agreement ever.

早在2018年，特朗普就與加拿大和墨西哥簽署了一項貿(mào)易協(xié)定，還滔滔不絕地吹噓這是有史以來最偉大的貿(mào)易協(xié)定。

Now, oh they are ripping us off like the rest of the world.

現(xiàn)在，哦，他們和世界上其他地方的人一樣在剝削我們。

Trump hit China with tariffs back then and who lost that was the US, because China started to wean itself on US goods like corn and soybeans. Really, besides Ag production China can get at home or elsewhere or pour a few million into Chatpg and do better than US tech companies.

特朗普當(dāng)時對中國加征關(guān)稅，結(jié)果受損的卻是美國，因為中國開始減少對美國玉米和大豆等商品的依賴。實際上，除了農(nóng)產(chǎn)品，中國可以在國內(nèi)或其他地方獲取所需物資，或者向ChatGPT投入幾百萬美元，就能比美國科技公司做得更好。

Americans have this pic of China being an agricultural country of rice fields. Far from the truth. China in the most part is more modern that the US and others.

美國人認(rèn)為中國是一個有著稻田的農(nóng)業(yè)國家。這與事實相去甚遠(yuǎn)。在很大程度上，中國比美國和其他國家更現(xiàn)代化。

The problem is the US until trump 2.0 had tariffs on China but targeted and Biden did the same. Chips Act but also, tariffs the largest threat to the US, making chips and add the carrot. Worked.

問題在于，在美國特朗普第二任期之前就對中國征收針對性關(guān)稅，拜登也這么做了。出臺了《芯片法案》，但關(guān)稅也是對美國最大的威脅，既要制造芯片又得給點甜頭。這招奏效了。

trump has no idea of world trade, nor manufacturing. His supposed experience is in real estate and if true, he has no inkling of the world.

特朗普對世界貿(mào)易和制造業(yè)一竅不通。他所謂的經(jīng)驗是在房地產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域，即便這是真的，他對世界也是一無所知。

So lets 145% tariffs on China goods. He has sent many small businesses and bigger ones into shutting. The US auto industry relies on some parts from China. No matter US buyers will pay the diff.

所以對中國商品征收145%的關(guān)稅。他已經(jīng)導(dǎo)致許多大小企業(yè)倒閉。美國汽車行業(yè)依賴一些來自中國的零部件。不管怎樣，美國買家都得支付差價。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

A US steel company said they were off loading 1200 US workers cos the downturn of US cars. More to come.

一家美國鋼鐵公司稱，由于美國汽車業(yè)不景氣，他們正在解雇1200名美國工人。后續(xù)還會有更多（裁員）。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

The stable Genius does not have a clue but maybe inside trading.

這位所謂沉穩(wěn)的天才毫無頭緒，不過也許存在內(nèi)幕交易。

Irina Nic
tRump needs money to pay the US debt and the new deficit projected due to the tax cuts he wants to implement. So he came up with the idea of tariffs instead of creating a new tax. But tariffs are taxes that US are paying, but in contrast to a regular tax, now you bring in the equation some foreign countries as well. In his mind, in short term people in US will continue to buy products and pay his tariffs and in the long term the tariffs will stimulate new manufacturing in US which will bring again more money. The problems that he didn't outline and stupid in US can’t understand are:

特朗普需要資金來償還美國債務(wù)以及因他想要實施的減稅政策而預(yù)計產(chǎn)生的新赤字。于是他想出了征收關(guān)稅的主意，而不是開征新稅。但關(guān)稅是美國人在支付的稅款，與常規(guī)稅收不同的是，現(xiàn)在這一問題還涉及到一些外國。在他看來，短期內(nèi)美國人會繼續(xù)購買產(chǎn)品并支付他所征收的關(guān)稅，從長遠(yuǎn)來看，關(guān)稅將刺激美國新的制造業(yè)發(fā)展，進(jìn)而再次帶來更多資金。而他沒有說明且美國那些愚蠢之人也理解不了的問題是：

US will significantly pay more for products. Either they come from overseas and have tariffs or are produced in US and cost significant more than the original price- cue the inflation that is made by tRump.

美國將為產(chǎn)品支付更多的費用。這些產(chǎn)品要么來自海外需繳納關(guān)稅，要么在美國本土生產(chǎn)，但成本比原價高出很多——這都是特朗普造成的通貨膨脹所致。

Other countries will stop buying US products. tRump can force governments to agree to some deals, but he underestimated the toxic effect his way of talking has. Businesses and regular people started to boycott US products. Heck, we even stopped travelling to US. We also started to boycott the stock and bond market in US. Did you hear about SELL AMERICA? Look at your stock market and start crying.

其他國家將停止購買美國產(chǎn)品。特朗普可以迫使各國政府達(dá)成一些協(xié)議，但他低估了自己說話方式的負(fù)面影響。企業(yè)和普通民眾已經(jīng)開始抵制美國產(chǎn)品。哎呀，我們甚至都不去美國旅游了。我們還開始抵制美國的股票和債券市場。你聽說過“拋售美國”嗎？看看你們的股市，哭去吧。

US has a lot of debt that is held by its enemies now. As he is treating all of us as enemies. So countries now get together and sell your bonds which is your debt, like it happened 2 weeks ago while you were sleeping in US, the mystery sell off of bonds. Guess what, because of that sell off, tRump was forced to postpone the reciprocal tariffs. So when you want to make tRump to do something, the whole thing will play again.

美國現(xiàn)在有大量債務(wù)掌握在其敵人手中。因為它把我們所有人都當(dāng)作敵人。所以現(xiàn)在各國聯(lián)合起來拋售你們的債券，也就是你們的債務(wù)。就像兩周前在美國你們還在睡夢中時發(fā)生的神秘債券拋售事件一樣。你猜怎么著，由于那次拋售，特朗普被迫推遲了互惠關(guān)稅。所以當(dāng)你想讓特朗普做某件事時，這一切還會再次上演。

tRump is now accusing the Fed Jerome Powell that he doesn't lower the interest rate. If by any chance that will happen, your dollar will go down a lot. This means the prices will go up again as let's face it, you still don't produce stuff yet. This will compound the tariffs. You will pay again more money on products, hence the inflation will go up again.

特朗普現(xiàn)在指責(zé)美聯(lián)儲主席杰羅姆·鮑威爾沒有降低利率。如果真的出現(xiàn)這種情況，美元將會大幅貶值。這意味著物價會再次上漲，因為說實話，你們?nèi)匀粵]有生產(chǎn)出足夠的產(chǎn)品。這會使關(guān)稅問題更加復(fù)雜。你們購買產(chǎn)品時將再次支付更多的錢，因此通貨膨脹將會再次加劇。

All he does is to bankrupt US piece by piece, every day. Good luck with that, after all he is an expert in that, his companies got bankrupt 6 times and at least one time he bankrupt a casino, which is a major achievement in terms of bankrupting a business. Understand other countries have tariffs in place to protect a certain vital sector. Not for everything like he does. Also he underestimated the amount of time will take for this process to go from bad to good. It will take years and years, which again he doesn't have.

他每天所做的就是一點一點地把美國搞破產(chǎn)。祝他好運吧，畢竟他在這方面是個行家，他的公司已經(jīng)破產(chǎn)6次了，至少有一次他還搞垮了一家賭場，就企業(yè)破產(chǎn)而言，這可是一項“偉大成就”。要知道其他國家設(shè)置關(guān)稅是為了保護(hù)某些重要產(chǎn)業(yè)，而不是像他這樣對所有東西都（設(shè)置關(guān)稅）。而且，他低估了這個從糟糕狀況好轉(zhuǎn)所需要的時間。這得花上好多年，可他又沒那么多時間。

He will either be forced to postpone China tariffs very soon or face the music from the constituents.

他要么很快被迫推遲對中國商品加征關(guān)稅，要么就得承受選民的壓力。

China stopped buying oil from US, they stopped buying beef and agricultural products. Last time they did this while tRump 1.0, after the tariffs were down again, they never returned to buy again from US. This will happen again and you will lose market share in China and everywhere else. The rest of the world started to live again, we moved on after the initial shock, it's you who need to live with the consequences of his actions. So next time vote for him again, it will get better and better. Depends only for who.

中國停止從美國購買石油，也停止購買牛肉和農(nóng)產(chǎn)品。上次在特朗普執(zhí)政第一任期時他們就這么做了，關(guān)稅下調(diào)后，他們再也沒有恢復(fù)從美國購買。這種情況還會再次發(fā)生，而你們將在中國和其他地方失去市場份額。世界其他國家都重新開始正常生活了，在最初的沖擊過后我們繼續(xù)前行，而你們卻要承受他的行為帶來的后果。所以下次要是再投票選他，情況會“越來越好”的。不過這得看對誰而言了。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

Rob Boardman
The question is back to front.

這個問題本末倒置了。

Very few countries applied tariffs to U.S. goods.

極少有國家對美國商品征收關(guān)稅。

Trump hates income tax and loves tariffs (import sales taxes) to provide government moneys instead.

特朗普討厭所得稅，卻熱衷于用關(guān)稅（進(jìn)口銷售稅）來為政府提供資金。

He has been talking about tariffs since the 1980s.

自20世紀(jì)80年代以來，他就一直在談?wù)撽P(guān)稅問題。

He calls his tariffs "reciprocal" but they are not. They are new taxes on US consumers and Trump lies and says it's because other countries tries tariff the USA - as I said, very few countries did that.

他稱自己的關(guān)稅是“對等的”，但事實并非如此。這些關(guān)稅是加在美國消費者身上的新稅種，而特朗普撒謊稱這是因為其他國家試圖對美國征收關(guān)稅——正如我所說，很少有國家這么做。

His tariff scheme is in fact a reverse Robin Hood scheme. The import tariffs (sales tax) has US consumers filling the govt coffers (Trump boasts its 2 billion per day), so he can offer bigger income and business tax cuts to his rich buddies and himself.

他的關(guān)稅計劃實際上是一種逆向的劫貧濟(jì)富計劃。進(jìn)口關(guān)稅（銷售稅）讓美國消費者充實了政府金庫（特朗普吹噓每天有20億美元），這樣他就可以為他的富豪朋友和他自己提供更大幅度的所得稅和企業(yè)稅減免。

Robbing the poor to give to the rich.

劫貧濟(jì)富。

Damon Kaswell
The “colorful language” will be in a picture, rather than text, for two reasons:

“豐富的語言”將以圖片而非文字的形式呈現(xiàn)，原因有兩個：

I want to drive home the fact that this is my reaction I’m describing, not an argument. It includes lots of swearing and insults because that exemplifies the rage I’m currently feeling, but I don’t intend it to seem like a strictly logic-driven position. I’m angrier than I’ve ever been in my life right now, and what you’ll see reflects that.

我想強(qiáng)調(diào)一點，我在這里描述的是我的反應(yīng)，而非一場爭論。其中包含很多咒罵和侮辱性言語，因為這體現(xiàn)了我當(dāng)下的憤怒，但我并非想讓它顯得是一個完全基于邏輯的立場。我現(xiàn)在比這輩子任何時候都要憤怒，而你將會看到的內(nèi)容就反映了這一點。

Since it’s replete with insults and swearing, I don’t want Quora’s algorithms and bots to mistakenly assume I’m directing them at you personally, OP. I’m not.

因為其中充斥著侮辱性和咒罵性言語，我不想讓Quora的算法和機(jī)器人錯誤地認(rèn)為我這些話是針對提問者（OP）你個人的。我并不是這個意思。

Now then, some foundational points first:

那么，首先講一些基本要點：

You had approximately two years to figure out what tariffs actually are.

你有大約兩年的時間去弄清楚關(guān)稅到底是什么。

You've had your whole life to learn what a trade imbalance is, and why they're not actually inherently bad or in need of fixing.

你有一輩子的時間去了解貿(mào)易不平衡是什么，以及為什么貿(mào)易不平衡實際上并非本質(zhì)上就是壞事，也并非需要去糾正。

You've had several months now to figure out the nature of the modest, specific tariffs that have been in place for years, in both directions, between the United States and other countries.

你們已經(jīng)有好幾個月的時間來弄清楚多年來美國與其他國家之間雙向征收的適度且特定的關(guān)稅的性質(zhì)了。

You’ve had almost a decade to understand trade agreements like the USMCA, which Trump himself signed into law.

你有近十年的時間來了解像《美墨加協(xié)定》這樣的貿(mào)易協(xié)定，而該協(xié)定正是特朗普本人簽署使其成為法律的。

With that in mind, here is my honest portrayal of what I felt when I saw this question. Again, it's insulting, and intentionally so, because I want - need - for people who still somehow support Trump to understand what people who don't support him feel about you, and why.

考慮到這一點，以下是我看到這個問題時真實感受的如實描述。再說一次，這是一種侮辱，而且是故意為之，因為我希望——也有必要——那些不知為何仍然支持特朗普的人明白不支持他的人對你的看法以及原因。

That is the rage that’s in my heart right now. You’ve broken the country I grew up in, all in the name of sticking it to the libs. You’ve sold your country out, and wrapped yourself in the American flag while you did it.

這就是我此刻心中的憤怒。你們以對付自由派的名義，毀掉了我成長的這個國家。你們出賣了自己的國家，還在這么做的時候身披美國國旗。

Now you have a good idea of how angry we are, and how much it infuriates us to know we share a country with people willing to behave like you have.

現(xiàn)在你很清楚我們有多憤怒了，一想到和你這種行事作風(fēng)的人同屬一個國家，就讓我們怒火中燒。

So what now? How do we save this country? We can’t save it from you. The only way we get past this is if you find it in yourselves to recognize how badly you’ve messed up, and start making it right. And I genuinely don’t think you can. I don’t think you have the capacity to recognize your mistakes until they hurt hurt you so badly that it breaks down the walls you’ve built around your own critical thinking skills.

那現(xiàn)在怎么辦？我們要如何拯救這個國家？靠你們是拯救不了的。我們擺脫這種困境的唯一辦法是，你們要自己認(rèn)識到你們把事情搞得有多糟，然后開始改正。而我真的不認(rèn)為你們能做到。我覺得你們沒有能力認(rèn)識到自己的錯誤，直到錯誤給你們帶來巨大傷害，打破你們圍繞自己的批判性思維能力所筑起的壁壘。

You still don’t even know that these tariffs are not reciprocal. I don’t think you can know it. I don’t think you’re capable of allowing yourselves to know it, because doing so threatens your self-image as a MAGA-American.

你甚至還不知道這些關(guān)稅并非對等的。我覺得你不可能知道這一點。我認(rèn)為你根本不會讓自己去了解這一點，因為這么做會威脅到你作為支持“讓美國再次偉大”理念的美國人的自我認(rèn)知。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

In other words, I think you have doomed this country. I’m pessimistic about our ability to ever come back from this.

換句話說，我認(rèn)為你已經(jīng)把這個國家推向了絕境。我對我們能否從這種狀況中恢復(fù)過來感到悲觀。

We’ve obliterated the world’s trust in us. We’ve practically guaranteed the dollar becomes worthless internationally, as it stops being the world’s reserve currency. We’re going to be isolated, and we’re already rapidly becoming an economic pariah state.

我們已經(jīng)徹底摧毀了世界對我們的信任。實際上，我們已經(jīng)注定了美元在國際上變得一文不值，因為它不再是世界儲備貨幣。我們將會被孤立，而且我們已經(jīng)在迅速淪為經(jīng)濟(jì)上的棄兒。

為什么對美國商品加征關(guān)稅是可以接受的，而美國實施對等關(guān)稅卻不可接受呢？

為什么對美國商品加征關(guān)稅是可以接受的，而美國實施對等關(guān)稅卻不可接受呢？