RT:俄專家稱S-400讓印度對巴基斯坦占據(jù)優(yōu)勢
Russian shield for India How S-400s gave New Delhi an edge over Pakistan
譯文簡介
俄專家:從戰(zhàn)術(shù)成果到戰(zhàn)略信號傳遞,印度部署 S-400 既彰顯實(shí)力也昭示意圖
正文翻譯

Russian shield for India How S-400s gave New Delhi an edge over Pakistan
印度的俄羅斯之盾:S-400 如何讓新德里對巴基斯坦占據(jù)優(yōu)勢
From tactical results to strategic messaging, India’s deployment of the S-400 was as much about capability as it was about intent
從戰(zhàn)術(shù)成果到戰(zhàn)略信號傳遞,印度部署 S-400 既彰顯實(shí)力也昭示意圖
從戰(zhàn)術(shù)成果到戰(zhàn)略信號傳遞,印度部署 S-400 既彰顯實(shí)力也昭示意圖
By Dmitry Kornev, military expert, founder and author of the MilitaryRussia project
作者:德米特里·科爾涅夫,軍事專家,MilitaryRussia 項(xiàng)目創(chuàng)始人兼撰稿人
作者:德米特里·科爾涅夫,軍事專家,MilitaryRussia 項(xiàng)目創(chuàng)始人兼撰稿人
India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi made headlines when he publicly credited Russia’s S-400 “Triumf” air defense system with playing a key role in the country’s response to recent Pakistani strikes. More than a political gesture, Modi’s remarks marked the first confirmed combat use of the S-400 by Indian forces.
印度總理納倫德拉·莫迪公開贊揚(yáng)俄羅斯 S-400“凱旋”防空系統(tǒng)在應(yīng)對巴基斯坦近期空襲中發(fā)揮關(guān)鍵作用,引發(fā)廣泛關(guān)注。此舉不僅是政治姿態(tài),更標(biāo)志著印度軍隊(duì)首次確認(rèn)在實(shí)戰(zhàn)中使用了 S-400 系統(tǒng)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
印度總理納倫德拉·莫迪公開贊揚(yáng)俄羅斯 S-400“凱旋”防空系統(tǒng)在應(yīng)對巴基斯坦近期空襲中發(fā)揮關(guān)鍵作用,引發(fā)廣泛關(guān)注。此舉不僅是政治姿態(tài),更標(biāo)志著印度軍隊(duì)首次確認(rèn)在實(shí)戰(zhàn)中使用了 S-400 系統(tǒng)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
“Platforms like the S-400 have given unprecedented strength to the country,” he said while standing before the system. “A strong security shield has become the identity of India.”
“諸如 S-400 這樣的裝備為國家注入了前所未有的力量,”他站在該系統(tǒng)前說道,“強(qiáng)大的防護(hù)盾已成為印度的身份象征。”
“諸如 S-400 這樣的裝備為國家注入了前所未有的力量,”他站在該系統(tǒng)前說道,“強(qiáng)大的防護(hù)盾已成為印度的身份象征。”
He also noted that India now has access to military technology that its adversaries – chiefly Pakistan – simply can’t match. Coming amid a real military confrontation, his words carried unmistakable weight.
他還指出,印度現(xiàn)已擁有主要對手(尤其是巴基斯坦)無法企及的軍事技術(shù)。在真實(shí)軍事對抗的背景下,這番表態(tài)分量十足。
他還指出,印度現(xiàn)已擁有主要對手(尤其是巴基斯坦)無法企及的軍事技術(shù)。在真實(shí)軍事對抗的背景下,這番表態(tài)分量十足。
A real-world test
實(shí)戰(zhàn)檢驗(yàn)
實(shí)戰(zhàn)檢驗(yàn)
The clash erupted during India’s counterterrorism operation “Sindoor.” Pakistan responded with strikes on Indian military infrastructure using drones, precision-guided munitions, and air-to-ground missiles. For the first time, India deployed its Russian-made S-400s in combat, stationing them in the strategically sensitive states of Punjab and Rajasthan.
沖突爆發(fā)于印度反恐行動(dòng)“辛杜爾”期間。巴基斯坦動(dòng)用無人機(jī)、精確制導(dǎo)彈藥及空對地導(dǎo)彈對印度軍事設(shè)施實(shí)施打擊回?fù)簟S《仁状卧趯?shí)戰(zhàn)中部署了俄制 S-400 防空系統(tǒng),將其駐扎在具有戰(zhàn)略敏感性的旁遮普邦和拉賈斯坦邦。
沖突爆發(fā)于印度反恐行動(dòng)“辛杜爾”期間。巴基斯坦動(dòng)用無人機(jī)、精確制導(dǎo)彈藥及空對地導(dǎo)彈對印度軍事設(shè)施實(shí)施打擊回?fù)簟S《仁状卧趯?shí)戰(zhàn)中部署了俄制 S-400 防空系統(tǒng),將其駐扎在具有戰(zhàn)略敏感性的旁遮普邦和拉賈斯坦邦。
According to reports, the system successfully neutralized incoming threats before they even entered Indian airspace. Debris found on Pakistani territory suggests that ultra-long-range 40N6E missiles may have been used, capable of taking down targets from up to 370 kilometers away.
據(jù)報(bào)道,該系統(tǒng)在威脅尚未進(jìn)入印度領(lǐng)空前就成功將其攔截。在巴基斯坦境內(nèi)發(fā)現(xiàn)的殘骸表明,印方可能使用了射程達(dá) 370 公里的 40N6E 超遠(yuǎn)程導(dǎo)彈實(shí)施攔截。
據(jù)報(bào)道,該系統(tǒng)在威脅尚未進(jìn)入印度領(lǐng)空前就成功將其攔截。在巴基斯坦境內(nèi)發(fā)現(xiàn)的殘骸表明,印方可能使用了射程達(dá) 370 公里的 40N6E 超遠(yuǎn)程導(dǎo)彈實(shí)施攔截。
Military analyst Mikhail Khodaryonok summed it up bluntly:
軍事分析師米哈伊爾·霍達(dá)廖諾克直言不諱地總結(jié)道:
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
軍事分析師米哈伊爾·霍達(dá)廖諾克直言不諱地總結(jié)道:
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
The ultimate test for any weapon system is war. That’s where it either proves itself – or fails completely.
任何武器系統(tǒng)的終極考驗(yàn)都是戰(zhàn)爭。正是在戰(zhàn)場上,它要么證明自己的價(jià)值——要么徹底失敗。
任何武器系統(tǒng)的終極考驗(yàn)都是戰(zhàn)爭。正是在戰(zhàn)場上,它要么證明自己的價(jià)值——要么徹底失敗。
He believes the S-400 not only met but exceeded expectations during Russia’s own military campaign, successfully intercepting a wide range of targets – from SCALP cruise missiles and tactical ballistic rockets to drones and MLRS projectiles.
他認(rèn)為 S-400 不僅在俄羅斯自身的軍事行動(dòng)中達(dá)到預(yù)期,更超出預(yù)期,成功攔截了從"風(fēng)暴陰影"巡航導(dǎo)彈、戰(zhàn)術(shù)彈道火箭到無人機(jī)及多管火箭炮彈藥在內(nèi)的多種目標(biāo)。
他認(rèn)為 S-400 不僅在俄羅斯自身的軍事行動(dòng)中達(dá)到預(yù)期,更超出預(yù)期,成功攔截了從"風(fēng)暴陰影"巡航導(dǎo)彈、戰(zhàn)術(shù)彈道火箭到無人機(jī)及多管火箭炮彈藥在內(nèi)的多種目標(biāo)。
Now, it has proven itself again – this time in South Asia.
如今,這套系統(tǒng)再次證明了自己的實(shí)力——這次是在南亞地區(qū)。
如今,這套系統(tǒng)再次證明了自己的實(shí)力——這次是在南亞地區(qū)。
Why India сhose the S-400
印度為何選擇 S-400
印度為何選擇 S-400
India signed a $5.43 billion deal with Russia in 2018 for five regimental units of the S-400 after an exhaustive review of the country’s long-term defense needs. The country’s primary concerns: China and Pakistan.
印度在 2018 年與俄羅斯簽署了一項(xiàng)價(jià)值 54.3 億美元的協(xié)議,采購五個(gè)團(tuán)的 S-400 防空系統(tǒng),這是在全面評估該國長期國防需求后作出的決定。該國的主要關(guān)切對象是中國和巴基斯坦。
印度在 2018 年與俄羅斯簽署了一項(xiàng)價(jià)值 54.3 億美元的協(xié)議,采購五個(gè)團(tuán)的 S-400 防空系統(tǒng),這是在全面評估該國長期國防需求后作出的決定。該國的主要關(guān)切對象是中國和巴基斯坦。
At the time, China had already secured its own S-400 systems and was reportedly planning to deploy them in Ti..., just across the border from India. Delivery to India began in 2021, and the final shipments are scheduled for 2025. With each new deployment, India extends a sophisticated “air defense umbrella” across more of its vulnerable frontier.
當(dāng)時(shí),中國已獲得自己的 S-400 系統(tǒng),并據(jù)報(bào)計(jì)劃將其部署在西藏地區(qū),緊鄰印度邊境。對印度的交付始于 2021 年,最后一批預(yù)計(jì)于 2025 年完成。隨著每一套系統(tǒng)的部署,印度在其脆弱邊境線上空逐步撐起了一頂精密的"防空保護(hù)傘"。
當(dāng)時(shí),中國已獲得自己的 S-400 系統(tǒng),并據(jù)報(bào)計(jì)劃將其部署在西藏地區(qū),緊鄰印度邊境。對印度的交付始于 2021 年,最后一批預(yù)計(jì)于 2025 年完成。隨著每一套系統(tǒng)的部署,印度在其脆弱邊境線上空逐步撐起了一頂精密的"防空保護(hù)傘"。
The decision to buy the S-400 was driven by its standout capability to intercept virtually any airborne threat: aircraft, helicopters, drones, cruise missiles, smart bombs, and ballistic missiles. No other air defense system on the market offers this level of versatility.
采購 S-400 的決定源于其卓越的多目標(biāo)攔截能力:無論是飛機(jī)、直升機(jī)、無人機(jī)、巡航導(dǎo)彈、智能炸彈還是彈道導(dǎo)彈,幾乎都能有效攔截。市場上其他防空系統(tǒng)均無法提供如此全面的防護(hù)性能。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
采購 S-400 的決定源于其卓越的多目標(biāo)攔截能力:無論是飛機(jī)、直升機(jī)、無人機(jī)、巡航導(dǎo)彈、智能炸彈還是彈道導(dǎo)彈,幾乎都能有效攔截。市場上其他防空系統(tǒng)均無法提供如此全面的防護(hù)性能。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Khodaryonok points out that if the coordinates are known, the S-400 can even be used to strike ground targets – though that’s not its primary function.
霍達(dá)廖諾克指出,如果已知坐標(biāo),S-400 甚至可用于打擊地面目標(biāo)——盡管這不是其主要功能。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
霍達(dá)廖諾克指出,如果已知坐標(biāo),S-400 甚至可用于打擊地面目標(biāo)——盡管這不是其主要功能。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Equally important for India, the system integrates smoothly with the country’s existing command infrastructure, which still bears the hallmarks of Soviet and Russian design. For India, adopting the S-400 wasn’t just a technical upgrade – it was an evolution built on decades of military-technical continuity.
對印度同樣重要的是,該系統(tǒng)能無縫融入該國現(xiàn)有指揮體系,而該體系仍保留著蘇聯(lián)和俄羅斯設(shè)計(jì)的鮮明特征。對印度而言,采用 S-400 不僅是技術(shù)升級,更是基于數(shù)十年軍事技術(shù)傳承的演進(jìn)。
對印度同樣重要的是,該系統(tǒng)能無縫融入該國現(xiàn)有指揮體系,而該體系仍保留著蘇聯(lián)和俄羅斯設(shè)計(jì)的鮮明特征。對印度而言,采用 S-400 不僅是技術(shù)升級,更是基于數(shù)十年軍事技術(shù)傳承的演進(jìn)。
S-400 vs. Patriot: Different philosophies
S-400 對陣愛國者:理念差異
S-400 對陣愛國者:理念差異
The American-made Patriot system is often cited as an alternative, but the two platforms reflect fundamentally different doctrines.
美制愛國者系統(tǒng)常被視為替代選項(xiàng),但這兩款平臺(tái)體現(xiàn)了根本不同的作戰(zhàn)理念。
美制愛國者系統(tǒng)常被視為替代選項(xiàng),但這兩款平臺(tái)體現(xiàn)了根本不同的作戰(zhàn)理念。
The Patriot was developed during the Cold War to protect NATO forces from enemy aircraft and short-range missiles. Its fire zones are narrow, and it can take up to 25 minutes to fully deploy – an eternity in a fast-moving conflict.
"愛國者"導(dǎo)彈系統(tǒng)是在冷戰(zhàn)期間為保護(hù)北約部隊(duì)免受敵方飛機(jī)和短程導(dǎo)彈威脅而研發(fā)的。其火力覆蓋區(qū)域狹窄,且完全部署需耗時(shí)長達(dá) 25 分鐘——在瞬息萬變的戰(zhàn)場上堪稱漫長。
"愛國者"導(dǎo)彈系統(tǒng)是在冷戰(zhàn)期間為保護(hù)北約部隊(duì)免受敵方飛機(jī)和短程導(dǎo)彈威脅而研發(fā)的。其火力覆蓋區(qū)域狹窄,且完全部署需耗時(shí)長達(dá) 25 分鐘——在瞬息萬變的戰(zhàn)場上堪稱漫長。
The S-400, on the other hand, was designed to provide wide-area coverage as part of a national air defense grid. It takes just five minutes to deploy and can simultaneously track up to 300 targets. Its engagement range extends up to 400km in distance and 35km in altitude.
相比之下,S-400 系統(tǒng)作為國家防空網(wǎng)絡(luò)的一部分,旨在提供廣域防御。它僅需五分鐘即可完成部署,并能同時(shí)追蹤多達(dá) 300 個(gè)目標(biāo),其作戰(zhàn)范圍最遠(yuǎn)可達(dá) 400 公里,射高達(dá) 35 公里。
相比之下,S-400 系統(tǒng)作為國家防空網(wǎng)絡(luò)的一部分,旨在提供廣域防御。它僅需五分鐘即可完成部署,并能同時(shí)追蹤多達(dá) 300 個(gè)目標(biāo),其作戰(zhàn)范圍最遠(yuǎn)可達(dá) 400 公里,射高達(dá) 35 公里。
As Khodaryonok put it, “In almost every key metric, Patriot falls short of Triumf – especially in range, target variety, and electronic countermeasures.”
正如霍達(dá)廖諾克所言:"幾乎在所有關(guān)鍵指標(biāo)上,'愛國者'都遜色于'凱旋'系統(tǒng)——尤其在射程、目標(biāo)多樣性及電子對抗能力方面。"
正如霍達(dá)廖諾克所言:"幾乎在所有關(guān)鍵指標(biāo)上,'愛國者'都遜色于'凱旋'系統(tǒng)——尤其在射程、目標(biāo)多樣性及電子對抗能力方面。"
The missile loadouts tell the story too:
導(dǎo)彈配置同樣說明問題:
導(dǎo)彈配置同樣說明問題:
S-400 uses a broad mix: 48N6 (up to 250 km), 9M96M (up to 130 km), 40N6E (up to 370 km), and 9M100 for short-range defense.
S-400 系統(tǒng)采用多樣化導(dǎo)彈組合:48N6 型(射程達(dá) 250 公里)、9M96M 型(射程達(dá) 130 公里)、40N6E 型(射程達(dá) 370 公里)以及用于近程防御的 9M100 型。
S-400 系統(tǒng)采用多樣化導(dǎo)彈組合:48N6 型(射程達(dá) 250 公里)、9M96M 型(射程達(dá) 130 公里)、40N6E 型(射程達(dá) 370 公里)以及用于近程防御的 9M100 型。
The Patriot relies mainly on MIM-104 and ERINT, with far fewer options.
愛國者系統(tǒng)主要依賴 MIM-104 和 ERINT 導(dǎo)彈,可選方案遠(yuǎn)少于前者。
愛國者系統(tǒng)主要依賴 MIM-104 和 ERINT 導(dǎo)彈,可選方案遠(yuǎn)少于前者。
Cost vs. Capability
成本與性能之比
成本與性能之比
The S-400’s biggest advantage might just be its price-to-performance ratio.
S-400 系統(tǒng)的最大優(yōu)勢或許正是其性價(jià)比。
S-400 系統(tǒng)的最大優(yōu)勢或許正是其性價(jià)比。
When China purchased two S-400 regiments, the price tag exceeded $3 billion. For India, each regiment cost around $1 billion. That’s enough to defend an area roughly 1,000 by 500 kilometers against simultaneous attacks by hundreds of aircraft and missiles.
中國采購兩個(gè) S-400 防空導(dǎo)彈團(tuán)時(shí),價(jià)格超過了 30 億美元。而對印度而言,每個(gè)團(tuán)的成本約為 10 億美元。這足以防御約 1000 公里長、500 公里寬的區(qū)域,抵御數(shù)百架飛機(jī)和導(dǎo)彈的同時(shí)攻擊。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
中國采購兩個(gè) S-400 防空導(dǎo)彈團(tuán)時(shí),價(jià)格超過了 30 億美元。而對印度而言,每個(gè)團(tuán)的成本約為 10 億美元。這足以防御約 1000 公里長、500 公里寬的區(qū)域,抵御數(shù)百架飛機(jī)和導(dǎo)彈的同時(shí)攻擊。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
By contrast, equipping India with enough Patriot systems for comparable coverage would cost several times more. A single Patriot battery alone is often priced similarly to an entire S-400 regiment – despite offering much less coverage and flexibility.
相比之下,為印度配備覆蓋范圍相當(dāng)?shù)膼蹏呦到y(tǒng),成本將高出數(shù)倍。僅一個(gè)愛國者導(dǎo)彈連的價(jià)格就常與整個(gè) S-400 團(tuán)相當(dāng)——盡管其覆蓋范圍和靈活性遠(yuǎn)遜于后者。
相比之下,為印度配備覆蓋范圍相當(dāng)?shù)膼蹏呦到y(tǒng),成本將高出數(shù)倍。僅一個(gè)愛國者導(dǎo)彈連的價(jià)格就常與整個(gè) S-400 團(tuán)相當(dāng)——盡管其覆蓋范圍和靈活性遠(yuǎn)遜于后者。
India’s choice, in this light, wasn’t just practical. It was strategic – and smart.
由此可見,印度的選擇不僅務(wù)實(shí),更是戰(zhàn)略性的明智之舉。
由此可見,印度的選擇不僅務(wù)實(shí),更是戰(zhàn)略性的明智之舉。
Strategic Reach and Export Appeal
戰(zhàn)略覆蓋范圍與出口吸引力
戰(zhàn)略覆蓋范圍與出口吸引力
Only a handful of nations can produce air defense systems like the S-400. So far, China, India, and Turkey have officially acquired the system. But dozens of countries – from Saudi Arabia and Algeria to Iran and even Latin American states – have expressed an interest.
目前僅有少數(shù)國家能生產(chǎn) S-400 這類防空系統(tǒng)。中國、印度和土耳其已正式采購該裝備,但數(shù)十個(gè)國家——從沙特阿拉伯、阿爾及利亞到伊朗乃至拉丁美洲國家——均表示出濃厚興趣。
目前僅有少數(shù)國家能生產(chǎn) S-400 這類防空系統(tǒng)。中國、印度和土耳其已正式采購該裝備,但數(shù)十個(gè)國家——從沙特阿拉伯、阿爾及利亞到伊朗乃至拉丁美洲國家——均表示出濃厚興趣。
“There’s a waiting list for the S-400—and it keeps growing,” says Khodaryonok. “Quality weapons don’t come cheap. But nations that prioritize defense choose Triumf.”
霍達(dá)廖諾克表示:“S-400 的采購名單在不斷延長,優(yōu)質(zhì)武器從來價(jià)格不菲。但重視國防的國家都會(huì)選擇‘凱旋’系統(tǒng)?!?/b>
霍達(dá)廖諾克表示:“S-400 的采購名單在不斷延長,優(yōu)質(zhì)武器從來價(jià)格不菲。但重視國防的國家都會(huì)選擇‘凱旋’系統(tǒng)?!?/b>
Turkey’s decision to buy the S-400 despite threats of US sanctions shows just how powerful that appeal can be. For many, it’s not just a weapons purchase – it’s a step toward greater strategic autonomy.
土耳其不顧美國制裁威脅堅(jiān)持購買 S-400,充分證明了這種吸引力的強(qiáng)大。對許多國家而言,這不僅是軍購行為,更是邁向戰(zhàn)略自主的重要一步。
土耳其不顧美國制裁威脅堅(jiān)持購買 S-400,充分證明了這種吸引力的強(qiáng)大。對許多國家而言,這不僅是軍購行為,更是邁向戰(zhàn)略自主的重要一步。
India’s S-400 Future: Ready for Anything
印度 S-400 的未來:為一切做好準(zhǔn)備
印度 S-400 的未來:為一切做好準(zhǔn)備
Once all five regiments are in place, India will be able to shield its entire northern and western borders, as well as critical coastal zones in the south—vital for securing trade routes and deterring precision air strikes.
一旦五個(gè)團(tuán)全部部署完畢,印度將能夠保護(hù)其整個(gè)北部和西部邊境,以及南部關(guān)鍵沿海地區(qū)——這對保障貿(mào)易路線安全和威懾精確空襲至關(guān)重要。
一旦五個(gè)團(tuán)全部部署完畢,印度將能夠保護(hù)其整個(gè)北部和西部邊境,以及南部關(guān)鍵沿海地區(qū)——這對保障貿(mào)易路線安全和威懾精確空襲至關(guān)重要。
What’s being built is more than just a missile shield. It’s a multi-layered, autonomous defense system designed to withstand massive air raids, drone swarms, hypersonic threats, and saturation missile attacks.
正在構(gòu)建的不僅僅是一個(gè)導(dǎo)彈防御系統(tǒng)。它是一個(gè)多層次的自主防御體系,旨在抵御大規(guī)??找u、無人機(jī)群、高超音速威脅以及飽和導(dǎo)彈攻擊。
正在構(gòu)建的不僅僅是一個(gè)導(dǎo)彈防御系統(tǒng)。它是一個(gè)多層次的自主防御體系,旨在抵御大規(guī)??找u、無人機(jī)群、高超音速威脅以及飽和導(dǎo)彈攻擊。
The recent conflict with Pakistan was a turning point. For the first time, India brought high-end Russian technology into real combat – and saw firsthand what it could do. The S-400 didn’t just stop enemy missiles. It sent a message.
近期與巴基斯坦的沖突是一個(gè)轉(zhuǎn)折點(diǎn)。印度首次將高端俄羅斯技術(shù)投入實(shí)戰(zhàn)——并親眼見證了其威力。S-400 不僅攔截了敵方導(dǎo)彈,更傳遞了一個(gè)信號。
近期與巴基斯坦的沖突是一個(gè)轉(zhuǎn)折點(diǎn)。印度首次將高端俄羅斯技術(shù)投入實(shí)戰(zhàn)——并親眼見證了其威力。S-400 不僅攔截了敵方導(dǎo)彈,更傳遞了一個(gè)信號。
The S-400 “Triumf” isn’t just another piece of hardware. It’s a political lever, a pillar of strategic independence, and a cornerstone of airpower in South-East Asia.
S-400“凱旋”不僅是又一件硬件裝備,它是政治杠桿、戰(zhàn)略獨(dú)立的支柱,更是東南亞空中力量的核心基石。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
S-400“凱旋”不僅是又一件硬件裝備,它是政治杠桿、戰(zhàn)略獨(dú)立的支柱,更是東南亞空中力量的核心基石。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
評論翻譯
很贊 ( 12 )
收藏
How many Pakistani planes did it shoot down?
它擊落了多少架巴基斯坦飛機(jī)?
Pakistan has claimed to have destroyed s400 units
巴基斯坦宣稱已摧毀 S-400 防空系統(tǒng)單位
Without evidence you can claim whatever you want.
沒有證據(jù),你可以隨意聲稱任何事。
Check for yourself. Run Google on: indian s-400 operator killed
自行查證。在谷歌搜索:印度 S-400 操作員被殺
標(biāo)題:印度士兵死亡事件強(qiáng)化巴基斯坦關(guān)于 S-400 的敘事
一家印度當(dāng)?shù)匦侣劸W(wǎng)站報(bào)道稱,在敵對行動(dòng)中喪生的軍官曾操作 S-400 系統(tǒng)
Just like the Ukraine who shot down all 200 missiles of the 10 that Russia did send.
就像烏克蘭擊落了俄羅斯發(fā)射的 10 枚導(dǎo)彈中的全部 200 枚一樣。
ROFL
笑到打滾
So minus 1?
所以減 1?
Pakistan destroyed one component of the S-400 (export) version. The operator of that component was killed.
巴基斯坦摧毀了 S-400(出口版)的一個(gè)組件,該操作員在事件中喪生。
我認(rèn)為 S-400 在從一個(gè)地點(diǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移至另一個(gè)地點(diǎn)時(shí)被無人機(jī)或衛(wèi)星追蹤。問題在于印度本應(yīng)遵循程序避免暴露,因此是印度軍方的失誤,而非 S-400 系統(tǒng)本身的問題。
Plenty of video evidence shown by Pakistani and Western media.
巴基斯坦及西方媒體展示了大量視頻證據(jù)。
Interception covers missile and drone attack defensive measures. Military aircraft such as jets and helicopters are different. Calibration is altered slightly to compensate accordingly
攔截涵蓋導(dǎo)彈和無人機(jī)攻擊的防御措施。軍用飛機(jī)如噴氣機(jī)和直升機(jī)則有所不同。需微調(diào)校準(zhǔn)參數(shù)以進(jìn)行相應(yīng)補(bǔ)償
it shot down all 300 of the 42 planes Pakistan had in the air.
它擊落了巴基斯坦在空中飛行的 42 架飛機(jī)中的全部 300 架。
ZERO. But the fireworks were impressive on Indian Bollywood TV.
零。但印度寶萊塢電視上的煙花表演令人印象深刻。
Two. F16 and Su30M.
兩架。F16 和蘇 30M。
For God’s sack. For the first time we realized how useless these air defence systems are.
看在上帝的份上。我們第一次意識到這些防空系統(tǒng)有多么無用。
MOSLEM IN RUSSIA SHOULD STOP FIGHTING FOR Russia for Helping Indians over moslems in Pakistan the Russian scum
俄羅斯的穆斯林應(yīng)停止為俄方效力 俄羅斯幫助印度壓制巴基斯坦穆斯林的行徑卑劣
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
India has shot down multiple targets including awacs and missiles not to mention fighter planes with s 400 . However since they were all destroyed before entering indian boundaries the debris fell into Pakistan which we all know are would not admit to losses.
印度已使用 S-400 防空系統(tǒng)擊落多個(gè)目標(biāo),包括預(yù)警機(jī)、導(dǎo)彈,更不用說戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)了。然而,由于它們都在進(jìn)入印度邊界前被摧毀,殘骸落入巴基斯坦境內(nèi),而眾所周知,巴方不會(huì)承認(rèn)這些損失。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Sad to see Russian and Chinese weapons pitted against eachother, but this is the way of the world. All conflicts are proving grounds. Testing grounds…
看到俄羅斯和中國的武器相互對抗令人遺憾,但這就是世界的運(yùn)行方式。所有沖突都是試驗(yàn)場,檢驗(yàn)場……
Pr Putin has offered india joint production and sale of s 500 to india. India has nevertheless ordered more of s400….
普京總統(tǒng)已向印度提議聯(lián)合生產(chǎn)并出售 S-500 防空系統(tǒng)。盡管如此,印度仍追加訂購了更多 S-400……
Why is RT carrying these ridiculous stories, but makes no mention of the rather embarrassing events of Pakistan’s deployment of Chinese equipment completely grounding the Indian Air Force. At some point twisting some facts and concealing others becomes tiresome propaganda.
為何 RT 要發(fā)布這些荒謬的報(bào)道,卻對巴基斯坦部署中國裝備導(dǎo)致印度空軍全面停飛這一相當(dāng)尷尬的事件只字不提?在某些時(shí)候,扭曲部分事實(shí)并隱瞞其他信息只會(huì)讓宣傳顯得乏味可憎。
Show evidence…don’t pedal lies.
拿出證據(jù)…別散布謊言。
You should read Pakistan propaganda instead.
你應(yīng)該讀讀巴基斯坦的宣傳內(nèi)容。
Well hey, RT is the voice of Kremlin and Russian MIC as well. They also sell the Holocaust daily.
嘿,RT 可是克里姆林宮和俄羅斯軍工復(fù)合體的喉舌,他們每天都在兜售大屠殺的論調(diào)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
The story was only about S400, not the whole incident. Simple. Or did you expect Sudan, Libya news too?
這篇報(bào)道僅涉及 S400 系統(tǒng),而非整個(gè)事件。就這么簡單。難道你還期待看到蘇丹、利比亞的新聞嗎?
Like it ?shielded? Syria?
就像它“保護(hù)”了敘利亞那樣?
Syria have no S 400 systems, sorry !
敘利亞沒有 S-400 系統(tǒng),抱歉!
They had an s300 but when used, an Israel attack jet hid behind a Russian reconnaissance plane, killing 15 still unavenged Russian heroes. They cut Syria off from its use after that
他們曾擁有 S-300 防空系統(tǒng),但在使用過程中,一架以色列攻擊機(jī)躲藏在一架俄羅斯偵察機(jī)后方,導(dǎo)致 15 名俄羅斯英雄犧牲至今未獲復(fù)仇。此后敘利亞被切斷了該系統(tǒng)的使用權(quán)。
Really !!! Selling advanced weapon to India gives bad reputation to that weapon system. In 2019 India – Pak conflict, India shot down its own helicopter killing 6 Indian service men. Maybe India used S-400 for that. Pakistan shot down total 4 – 5 Indian fighters in 2019 and 2025 air battle. Air defense don’t help you in Dog Fight.
真的嗎!?。∠蛴《瘸鍪巯冗M(jìn)武器只會(huì)損害該武器系統(tǒng)的聲譽(yù)。在 2019 年印巴沖突中,印度誤擊自家直升機(jī),造成 6 名印度軍人喪生。說不定印度當(dāng)時(shí)用的就是 S-400。巴基斯坦在 2019 年和 2025 年的空戰(zhàn)中總計(jì)擊落了 4 到 5 架印度戰(zhàn)機(jī)。空防系統(tǒng)在狗斗中可幫不上忙。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Pakistan did zero damage to India. Pakistani madarasa educated journalists write everything except truth. Anything but Truth. The public are brainwashed to a point of no return. Pakistanis are living in a shell of lies.
巴基斯坦對印度未造成任何損害。巴基斯坦宗教學(xué)校培養(yǎng)出的記者們寫的全是謊言,唯獨(dú)不寫真相。民眾被洗腦至無可救藥的地步。巴基斯坦人生活在謊言的殼中。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Well, India did not have the S 400 2019.
嗯,印度在 2019 年還沒有 S-400 防空系統(tǒng)。
Russian SAMs are making Uncle Sam tremble, pun intended.
俄羅斯的地對空導(dǎo)彈正讓山姆大叔顫抖,雙關(guān)語勿怪。
According to reports, Pakistan was able to destroy at least one battery of the S-400 system, possibly the radars with a hypersonic CM-400 AKG missile fired from a JF-17. With incoming J-35s, S-400 will probably become sitting ducks and will be taken out in first wave.
據(jù)報(bào)道,巴基斯坦成功摧毀了至少一套 S-400 防空系統(tǒng)的彈倉,可能是通過 JF-17 戰(zhàn)機(jī)發(fā)射的 CM-400 AKG 高超音速導(dǎo)彈命中了雷達(dá)系統(tǒng)。隨著 J-35 戰(zhàn)機(jī)的加入,S-400 很可能淪為被動(dòng)目標(biāo),并在首波攻擊中被清除。
show evidence.
出示證據(jù)。
?can simultaneously track up to 300 targets?. A really effective use of chips from washing machines, right, Ursula ?.
?可同時(shí)追蹤多達(dá) 300 個(gè)目標(biāo)?。真是把洗衣機(jī)芯片物盡其用了啊,烏爾蘇拉?
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Lol pakistan military and their concubines lives are getting decimated and difficult day by day getting beaten like punks in field and narrative, wooden ducks and paperweights rofl
笑死,巴基斯坦軍隊(duì)及其附庸的日子越來越難熬,在戰(zhàn)場上和輿論戰(zhàn)中被揍得像小混混一樣,簡直是木鴨子和鎮(zhèn)紙,哈哈
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
India claimed after S-400 acquisition that Pakistan will not be able to take off its fighters in next conflict. So, why were S-400 unable to do that now? Not only PAF fighters were up in the air, doing dog fights, BVR engagements, but also shooting down IAF jets without interception from S-400. S-400 failed to intercept even a single PAF fighter. Not only that, PAF also claimed to destroy one S-400 battery. In my opinion, S-400 provided some kind of deterrence, but when push came to shove, S-400 were simply inefficient and failed at the job.
印度在獲得 S-400 后曾宣稱,巴基斯坦在下次沖突中將無法起飛其戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)。那么,為何現(xiàn)在 S-400 未能實(shí)現(xiàn)這一目標(biāo)?不僅巴基斯坦空軍(PAF)的戰(zhàn)機(jī)升空進(jìn)行了近距離格斗和超視距交戰(zhàn),還擊落了印度空軍(IAF)的噴氣機(jī),而 S-400 卻未能實(shí)施任何攔截。S-400 連一架 PAF 戰(zhàn)機(jī)都未能成功攔截。不僅如此,PAF 還聲稱摧毀了一套 S-400 防空系統(tǒng)。在我看來,S-400 提供了一定程度的威懾,但當(dāng)真正考驗(yàn)來臨時(shí),S-400 表現(xiàn)低效且未能完成任務(wù)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
That is what Pakistan says. Keep dreaming
這是巴基斯坦的說法。繼續(xù)做夢吧
This is interesting, so Russia and China are testing their weapons without attacking each other. How clever.
這很有趣,俄羅斯和中國在測試各自的武器卻沒有互相攻擊。真聰明。
S 300 were useless against Israel ( oh I forgot. Russia did not allow it being used). Now we know it was useless in all cases. Pakistan took it out with an old Chinese weapon
S-300 對以色列毫無用處(哦,我忘了。俄羅斯不允許使用它)?,F(xiàn)在我們知道它在所有情況下都無用。巴基斯坦用一款老舊的中國武器就把它打掉了。
Well, evidence ?
那么,證據(jù)呢?
S500 will be endgame for pakistan military existence it will be end of pakistan army GENO.... they carry of pashtuns and balochis, so S 400 is like grapes are sour for pakistan military that is the moral of story(they know only Chinese temu version is available for pakistan army) and it doesn’t matter how much social media concubines of pakistan army blabber and cry, paki military knows they have been beaten so badly in this skirmish with their neighbour that pakistan military moral and spirit has hit a new low(daily and slowly they are accepting losses)it’s like they have been slapped on their faces but they are celebrating saying hey we managed to get fingerprint. people of pakistan origin are facing daily humiliation at their workplace and deep down in their conscience they know terrorism perpetrated by pakistan military dictatorship is leading them to worse time inching closer to liberation of Balochistan than in 1971 with liberation of Bangladesh and humiliation for generations
S500 將成為巴基斯坦軍事存在的終結(jié),意味著巴基斯坦軍隊(duì)對普什圖人和俾路支人實(shí)施的種族滅絕將走到盡頭。因此,S400 對巴基斯坦軍方而言如同酸葡萄心理(他們清楚只有中國特供版的 Temu 系統(tǒng)可供巴軍使用),無論巴基斯坦軍隊(duì)在社交媒體上的擁躉如何喋喋不休、哭天搶地,巴軍方心知肚明——在這場與鄰國的摩擦中他們已遭受重創(chuàng),軍隊(duì)士氣跌至新低(日復(fù)一日,他們正逐漸接受敗局)。這就像被當(dāng)眾扇了耳光卻還在歡呼“看啊,我們拿到了指紋”。巴基斯坦裔民眾在日常工作中飽受屈辱,內(nèi)心深處明白,由巴軍事DC政權(quán)主導(dǎo)的恐怖主義正將他們推向更黑暗的深淵,俾路支斯坦的解放比 1971 年孟加拉獨(dú)立時(shí)更近在咫尺,而這將給數(shù)代人帶來恥辱。
So much edge, that india lost three brand new jets lol
優(yōu)勢如此之大,以至于印度損失了三架嶄新的噴氣式飛機(jī),哈哈
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Everywhere s400 was deployed, it was a disaster. Syria (latakia), Crimea, now India
S400 系統(tǒng)部署之處,皆成災(zāi)難。敘利亞(拉塔基亞)、克里米亞,如今印度亦不例外
Meanwhile the International Civil Aviation Organisation just ruled that Russia was responsible for the downing of the Malaysian airliner of eastern Ukraine in 2014, likely with an S400. The evidence is overwhelming but Russia is still pretending that its’ proxy fighters in Donbass were not responsible for that huge blunder.
與此同時(shí),國際民用航空組織剛剛裁定俄羅斯應(yīng)對 2014 年馬來西亞客機(jī)在烏克蘭東部被擊落事件負(fù)責(zé),很可能是 S400 導(dǎo)彈所為。證據(jù)確鑿,但俄羅斯仍堅(jiān)稱其在頓巴斯的代理人武裝與這一重大失誤無關(guān)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Well, Ukraine was responsible.
好吧,是烏克蘭的責(zé)任。
Everyone knows it was a Buk missile, not from a S400 missile. The evidence is far from conclusive, and the investigation was a joke.
眾所周知,那是一枚 Buk 導(dǎo)彈,而非 S400 導(dǎo)彈。證據(jù)遠(yuǎn)非確鑿,調(diào)查簡直是個(gè)笑話。
the investigation was covered up from start to finish because they were supposed to shoot down a russian plane.
調(diào)查從一開始就被掩蓋了,因?yàn)樗麄儽緫?yīng)擊落一架俄羅斯飛機(jī)。
amazing imagination you have there.
你的想象力真是豐富。
荷蘭報(bào)告注意到了駕駛艙的彈孔,這就是他們不敢公布的原因。
The 400 system could not stop Russian hypersonic missiles.
S-400 系統(tǒng)無法攔截俄羅斯的高超音速導(dǎo)彈。
據(jù)我所知,目前尚無任何手段能做到,除非是完全自動(dòng)化的系統(tǒng),否則難以想象有何方法可以攔截。
科學(xué)的進(jìn)步,繼而武器的升級,已遠(yuǎn)超人類反應(yīng)能力數(shù)個(gè)量級。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
totally agree with this article. but, Russia should stop selling any high tech military equipment to China. They will reverse engineer.
完全同意這篇文章的觀點(diǎn)。但是,俄羅斯應(yīng)該停止向中國出售任何高科技軍事裝備。他們會(huì)進(jìn)行逆向工程。
More like Chinese made vs Russian made.
更像是中國制造對陣俄羅斯制造。
Russian superior yey simple tech better than anything else in the world
俄羅斯卓越而簡單的技術(shù)勝過全球任何其他產(chǎn)品
Pakistan zinda bhag
巴基斯坦萬歲
What is the gdp of Pakistan. I heard they are beggers
巴基斯坦的 GDP 是多少?我聽說他們總在乞討。
I heard people who don’t even know how to use Google think Pakistanis are beggers.
我聽說有些人連谷歌都不會(huì)用,卻認(rèn)為巴基斯坦人是乞丐。
Well, India showed it’s videos targeting all 9 Pakistan ?terrorist sites? and it’s air defense works! So, why is it so difficult for Pakistan to show just a single video/proof of any destroyed Indian aircraft?
印度展示了針對巴基斯坦 9 個(gè)“恐怖分子據(jù)點(diǎn)”的視頻,其防空系統(tǒng)運(yùn)作良好!那么,巴基斯坦為何連一段印度飛機(jī)被擊毀的視頻或證據(jù)都拿不出來呢?
Question still remains, why didn’t S400 work in Syria?
問題依然存在,為什么 S400 在敘利亞沒起作用?
俄羅斯希望以色列發(fā)動(dòng)攻擊嗎?
Russia only had a small install of S400 to defend their air base. When Israel attacked, with airpower, Assad had left and Israel did not attack Russian bases. Yes Russia did want Israel to destory the Syrian army weapons so they could not be used by the Al Queda govt.
俄羅斯僅部署了少量 S400 用于保衛(wèi)其空軍基地。當(dāng)以色列發(fā)動(dòng)空襲時(shí),阿薩德已撤離,以色列并未攻擊俄軍基地。是的,俄羅斯確實(shí)希望以色列摧毀敘利亞政府軍的武器,以防止這些武器被基地組織政府利用。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
That’s other way to say, what I mentioned.
這是另一種表達(dá)方式,與我提到的內(nèi)容一致。
They did not use the S400 system in Syria. The system was only to protect the Russian planes and airport. The Syrians used the S300 system which are not quite as good as the S400.
他們并未在敘利亞使用 S400 系統(tǒng)。該系統(tǒng)僅用于保護(hù)俄羅斯戰(zhàn)機(jī)和機(jī)場。敘利亞人使用的是性能稍遜于 S400 的 S300 系統(tǒng)。
Not true, both systems are MODERN (do not confuse with S-300PMU2 or similar, look it up on internet if you don’t know). There are 2 LONG range systems there. One is S-400 (specialized for fighter jets) the other is S-300V4 (specialized for ballistic and cruise missiles). S-300V4 is equivalent to S-400 but as anti-missile system.
并非如此,這兩套系統(tǒng)都是現(xiàn)代型號(別與 S-300PMU2 或類似型號混淆,若不清楚可上網(wǎng)查詢)。那里部署了兩套遠(yuǎn)程系統(tǒng):一套是 S-400(專為戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)設(shè)計(jì)),另一套是 S-300V4(專為彈道導(dǎo)彈和巡航導(dǎo)彈設(shè)計(jì))。S-300V4 在反導(dǎo)能力上與 S-400 相當(dāng)。
未來某日,S-500 將取代 S-300V4。
Then how did Israel destroyed S300 radar in Iran ?
那以色列是如何摧毀伊朗的 S300 雷達(dá)的?
it was there to protect Russian assets not syrian. they had s300 which is still better than patriot.
其存在是為了保護(hù)俄羅斯的資產(chǎn),而非敘利亞。他們擁有 S300,性能仍優(yōu)于愛國者系統(tǒng)。
他們與以色列也保持著一定程度的友好關(guān)系。
Because S-400 was strictly used for defending Russian military bases (naval-base and air-base)
因?yàn)?S-400 系統(tǒng)嚴(yán)格用于保衛(wèi)俄羅斯軍事基地(海軍基地和空軍基地)
俄羅斯一再強(qiáng)調(diào),在敘利亞部署的 S-400 僅用于保護(hù)俄方基地。
只要沒有戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)攻擊其基地,S-400 就不會(huì)啟動(dòng)。
阿薩德時(shí)期的敘利亞曾接收過由俄羅斯操作人員控制的 S-300PMU1 系統(tǒng),但由于與以色列存在未知協(xié)議,該系統(tǒng)使用受限。
It did work, but Russia for some reason didn’t shoot down any jew jets that were attacking the Syrian army, which leads me to believe Russia was told not to engage jew jets.
它確實(shí)起作用了,但俄羅斯出于某種原因沒有擊落任何攻擊敘利亞軍隊(duì)的猶太戰(zhàn)機(jī),這讓我相信俄羅斯被告知不要與猶太戰(zhàn)機(jī)交戰(zhàn)。
India have indigenous AD systems which supplemented S400, so don’t gloat.
印度擁有本土防空系統(tǒng)作為 S400 的補(bǔ)充,所以別得意。
My avatar is on the historical record as giving a small measure of positive credit to the Hyksos for bringing his greatest devotees horses. Sometimes technology brought from without is a good thing. However that isn’t the case when it comes to technology with no other purpose but cultural suicide such as S-400.
我的歷史形象記錄顯示,我曾對??怂魉谷藥砥渥铗\信徒馬匹一事給予些許積極評價(jià)。有時(shí),外部引入的技術(shù)是件好事。然而,對于像 S-400 這樣除了文化自殺別無他用的技術(shù),情況就并非如此了。
patriot was always over rated and under performing from GW1 onwards.
愛國者系統(tǒng)自海灣戰(zhàn)爭起就一直被高估且表現(xiàn)不佳。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Apparently Chinese aircraft are better than the S400. Russia backing the wrong horse in the Sino-indian conflict like the Soviets did AGAIN?
顯然中國戰(zhàn)機(jī)比 S400 更出色。俄羅斯在中印沖突中再次像蘇聯(lián)那樣押錯(cuò)了馬?
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.equalizerredsea.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處